Various workplace drugs, as well as alcohol testing policies, might be conducted wrong, which can cause serious consequences. However, you must know that many of these problems and mistakes can be easily avoided with the help of proper preparation that also follows the rules and regulations, as well as with the help of some training.
Nonetheless, in this article, I will be talking about the most common mistakes that supervisors or managers might make when running a drug or alcohol test at the workplace so keep on reading. This can help you a lot in making those mistakes right and preventing them from happening again.
1. DOT regulations being applied to non-DOT regulated workers
The rules regarding drug and alcohol testing at the U.S. Department of Transportation only apply to a very small number of employees. Some employers think they can apply a DOT drug and alcohol testing strategy to every employee in the company.
This is a severe error because federal and local regulations instead apply to drug and alcohol testing of non-DOT-regulated staff. These rules may prohibit particular DOT-required testing methods. A few state and local drug testing laws give aggrieved workers a private legal right to sue their employers and substantial financial damages.
This is exactly the reason why supervisors must go through a dot reasonable suspicion training to identify everything they need to know before conducting a test on workers.
2. Not aware of the difference between state and local drug testing rules
The regulations governing drug and alcohol testing vary greatly between states as well as cities. Employers must educate themselves on the local and state testing rules that apply to their staff. The types of tests that may be performed, the samples and drugs that may be tested, the rules for informing employees of positive test results, along with the disciplinary actions that may be taken for testing positive are all governed by some countries.
3. Lack of a written policy
Since many states do not have legislation requiring drug testing, employers in such states frequently think it is not necessary to create a written drug testing policy for employees who are not covered by DOT regulations. However, all states agree that having a documented testing policy is beneficial.
The company should inform candidates and workers of the kind of testing that will be necessary, the kinds of behavior that are forbidden, and the disciplinary actions that will be taken for both positive and negative test results in the policy. If a drug or alcohol test result is a subject of litigation, doing this is extremely helpful.
4. Having a policy in writing that is unclear
Some employers like to keep their drug and alcohol testing policies short and to the point, even going so far as to say something like, “The Company reserves the right to perform drug and alcohol testing in its sole and absolute discretion.” Many issues are left unresolved by this strategy, including;
- What kinds of tests will be administered?
- What samples will undergo testing?
- What takes place when a test yields a negative result?
- What happens if a worker declines to take the test or has a positive result?
Because of this, it is better to have a documented testing policy that meets with all relevant federal, state, and local laws and addresses any concerns that staff members might have regarding the testing process and methods.
After that, have every employee sign a policy receipt testifying to their receipt of the document and understanding its consequences.
5. Consequences for positive test findings being applied inconsistently
For a positive drug or alcohol test result, employers occasionally seek the option of “disciplinary action that can include termination.” They might choose to have the option of keeping dedicated, long-term workers while letting go of others.
Even though this approach might seem logical, employers that adopt it must carefully consider their actions to make sure they are not unintentionally making preparations for future discrimination claims.
It could be possible to make a case for racial discrimination if, for instance, the employees who are let go frequently are people of color and the ones who are kept frequently are white.
6. Failing to conduct tests for reasonable suspicion right away
As soon as a detectable suspicion arises, reasonable suspicion tests must be carried out. Sometimes employers take too long to act because they are preoccupied with other tasks or because they are performing a thorough investigation. Alcohol tests must be performed within eight hours of a reasonable suspicion since alcohol metabolizes inside the human body very quickly.
There is a bit extra time—typically 24 up to 32 hours—for drug tests with reasonable suspicion. The testing should be done, however, as quickly as there is a reason for suspicion. It is more likely that the worker will test negative the longer there is between the suspicion and the test.
7. Failing to provide supervisors with training
When a drug and alcohol testing policy is prepared for execution, the business should train all supervisors to make sure they are aware of the policy as well as understand how to execute it. Without such training, supervisors frequently fail to read the policy or do not believe that the Human Resources Department or another organization will execute it.
Additionally, supervisors frequently fail to follow the regulations because they lack the skills necessary to determine reasonable suspicion and are hesitant to take a risk. All of these concerns should be covered in a training program that clarifies any doubts supervisors may have and familiarizes them with the policy’s guidelines.
Conclusion
I hope this article has helped you identify the mistakes that you might be making during a drug and alcohol test at your workplace. With this information, you can easily make changes and follow the proper testing procedure.
It is also worth mentioning that employers should seek legal advice to make sure their policies on drug and alcohol testing comply with all relevant legal requirements and fully cover the procedures the employer wishes to enforce in the workplace.
Leave a Reply